Y Narasimha Raju v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Registrar's note on receipt of a miscellaneous appeal under section 20 of the RDB Act, 1993 against an order by the DRT. The appeal is noted as being out of limitation, with a delay petition filed. No waiver application is recorded.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Misc. Appeal Dy. No. 670 of 2023, Date 09/10/2023
Sri Yenugudhati Narasimha Raju-------- Appellant
Versus
Canara Bank (e-Syndicate Bank) & Ors. ------- Respondent
Received an appeal filed online on 25/09/2023 and hard copy on 09/10/2023 under section 20 of the RDB Act, 1993 presented by Mr. Nemani Srinivas on behalf of Sri Yenugudhati Narasimha Raju, Appellant.
The appeal has been filed on behalf of Sri Yenugudhati Narasimha Raju against the order dated 21/08/2023 passed in I.A. No. 1586 of 2017 in O.A. No. 355 of 2014 in DRT, Visakhapatnam. Appeal fee with vakalatnama fee of Rs.255/- vide Transaction Ref. ID 2509230030515 dated 25/09/2023 has been paid through online along with the appeal.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
Appeal is not within the period of limitation. Delay petition being I.A. No. 392 of 2023 is filed u/s 5 of the Limitation Act read with section 24 of the Act, 1993 through online 04/10/2023 and hard copy on 09/10/2023 with application fee of Rs.250/- vide Transaction Ref. ID 0410230021642 dated 04/10/2023.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sri Yenugudhati Narasimha Raju
- respondent
Canara Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · October
- CNR
- 191090006702023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court