A. Meganathan v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, dismissed the appellant's delay application for default due to absence and rejected the pending appeal.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 29th day of September, 2023
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CHAIRPERSON
IA 330/2022 (Delay)
In
AIR 113/2022
(OA 292/2019 on the file of DRT-II, Chennai)
Between
A. Meganathan, Son of C. Arumugam, Jambukuttapatti Village, Pochampalli Taluk, Pochampalli Post, Krishnagiri District. …Appellant
And
- M/s Union Bank of India, Krishnagiri Branch, Rep. by its Senior Manager Mr. M. Prabhu Sharma, No.39/23, Byrappa Lane, Bangalore Road, Krishnagiri 635 001.
- R.V. Saravanan, Son of M. Venugopal, No.5/81A, Kuchoor Village, Pochampalli, Krishnagiri District. ..Respondents
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A. Meganathan
- respondent
M/s Union Bank of India
- respondent
R.V. Saravanan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 331090001132022
- Topic
- Arbitration
All orders in this case
17 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court