Mohd Ismail Ansari v. Punjab National Bank and 5 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
interlocutory order regarding service of appeal copy on counsel for respondent-Bank. Remanded for filing of reply and proof of publication.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 273/2019 Date: 05.07.2023
Mohd. Ismail Ansari Vs. Punjab National Bank & Ors.
Present: Shri Bablu, Advocate holding brief of Shri B. K. Kesharwani, counsel for the appellant, Shri Sudhanshu Mishra, counsel for the respondent no. 5 & 6,
Shri S. K. Srivastava, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-Bank, stating that he has not been served with the copy of appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he shall serve the same upon the counsel for the respondent-Bank during course of the day, who may file reply by the next date fixed.
Learned counsel for the respondent nos. 5 & 6 files reply after serving copy of the same upon the counsel for the appellant, who may file rejoinder by the next date.
As per office report dated 04.07.2023, no reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 & 2. Let the same be filed by the next date. The said report also records that no proof of publication has been filed for the respondent nos. 3 & 4. Let the same be filed by the next date, failing which appropriate order shall be passed.
List this case on 09.10.2023 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mohd. Ismail Ansari
- respondent
Punjab National Bank
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 091090002732019
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court