Hari Kishan Agarwal v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim order fixing timeline for an interim application seeking waiver of pre-deposit requirement under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act, 2002. No merits decided.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appl. Dy No. 843 of 2023
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
23.11.2023
Hari Kishan Agarwal & Ors.
… Appellants Vs.
State Bank of India & Ors.
….. Respondents
For Appellant : Mr. Nemani Srinivas, ld. Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Debasish Chakraborty, ld. Adv. for bank Ms. S. Achariya, ld. Adv. for auction purchaser
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
I.A. 442 of 2023 is for waiver from making pre-deposit u/s 18 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. Respondent no.1 and 2 is present. Represented no.5 auction purchaser is also present. Issue notice to the respondents no. 3 and 4. Affidavit of service within two weeks. Opposition may be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder, if any, within two weeks thereafter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Hari Kishan Agarwal
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court