This case was listed for service of process. Time was extended for the Bank to file a reply alleging proxy litigation. Notice was issued to two other respondents, and the case was adjourned for further service steps.
Time granted to the Bank to file reply; notice issued to respondent nos. 2 & 3; case listed for service.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Misc. Appeal No. 04/2023 Date: 10.05.2023
Present: Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the appellant, Shri Ramesh Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the respondent no. 1-Bank,
The office report dated 09.05.2023 shows that time was granted to the respondent-Bank to file reply to the submission made on behalf of the appellant that the present litigation is a proxy litigation, which is initiated by the appellant in connivance with the respondent no. 3, but no reply has been filed by the respondent-Bank. Let the same be filed by the next date.
Issue notice to the respondent nos. 2 & 3 by two modes i.e. Registered Post with A.D. and Speed Post. Steps to be taken by the appellant within a week. Affidavit of service along with tracking report be filed by the next date.
List this case on 24.08.2023 for service. Till then the interim order, if any, shall continue.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Appellant
Respondent no. 1-Bank
Respondent nos. 2 & 3
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
