Kanajam Vijaya Lakshmi v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Misc. Appeal No. 05 of 2023
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
03.08.2023
Smt. Kanajam Vijaya Lakshmi
... Appellants -VsA.O. Kotak Mahindra Bank & Anr ... Respondent
Mr. N. Srinivas, Learned Counsel for the Appellant. Ms. Kasturi Dasgupta, Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for the Respondent prays for and is granted two week’s time to file the opposition with copy to the Appellant who may file the rejoinder within a week thereafter.
Affidavit of service is taken on record. Respondent No. 2 is not served. Let Respondent No. 2 be served through paper publication in two newspapers, one in English and the other in vernacular language. Affidavit in opposition filed by the Respondent No. 1 is taken on record. Rejoinder if any be filed within two weeks.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Kanajam Vijaya Lakshmi
- respondent
A.O. Kotak Mahindra Bank
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court