Ifci Ltd. v. Shri Ishar Alloys through Official Liquidator High Court Bombay
Case brief
What is this about?
Chronologically indeterminate and content-invalid judgment from a Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal. No substantive order, bench composition, parties, or reasoning could be extracted.
What the court decided
ty>. IU-0-
Contd Sheet
Office Notes, Appearances
Date
and Registrar’s order/Chairperson’s Orders .
^oj >7b^ ”/
?• <
\ fvr rtJirrW'&J - 1
u-
3 . ^rri®^ ‘
jieT' 202-3.
^>/t>C'4fc2J3 i^Ab, ?
c/efatt •■
JeA ek^ ^os^-
. :A so <-i^t^xnxudPo-pW®
■’*4 -—:sSr5&
G3IC>eiQ.CQ3 Pi8-v ■ P'zHyasP JaJvn Por App^ lda'~
fNone Pott Pesp or>derM- .
Yo I /<X£)
Adtj Pats' Aer'twaJ o<? ck^2-
2.A loSl^^ ■ f W7
^a>/. A<i;Vya., .Pio??- .pppe>lan+- • '~E(CJ&gfehrtia-
21105 10.023
fXIone Pott VVm< f^-e^ovJ oi-
|3)1’/'zoa3
fxdj rcr®
Due to administrative reason,
Board discharged. o^-o|-2o24
%
FARAD
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL.
MUMBAI
»• — ,
A
Mlsc Application No. of 20
In I. No.
Appeal jp/ No. 360
of 20^5
... Appellants
(AdvoMte r^g^ (
i
!r;':
Versus
Respondents
I sli | OOpS 4^0 25
(Advocate.
-------------- )
Date Office Notes, Appearances
and Registrar’s order / Chairperson’s Orders
Appeal presented .
"cTn kZZ i
Advocate for Appellant with R.D.--/-IP9 of Rs. on
I
being aggrieved by the impugned order / tinal order
passed on in No.
_ of
by DRT7-_0ru/s 20 of R.D.D.B.& F I Act 1993 / 18 of
■ a
S.A.R.FAe'S.I. Act. 2002.
Exh - -I Appeal Memo
S.O. for compliance to IHo
REGISTRAR
Registrar (i/c)
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court