Leena Ranjini v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
List of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal wherein the lawyer for the appellant has not provided documents to the respondent bank despite instructions.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 2/2023 in A.IR:368/202 2
Dr. Leena Ranjini.V V/S Sbi
30/05/2023
Appellant counsel present.
Ld Counsel Rajesh for Respondent Bank present. Informs that copy of Documents have not been served yet and also ‘No settlement’ made in this regard so far.
Despite instructions given on previous occasions on 09/03/2023, 30/05/2023, 13/04/2023, 19/04/2023, 09/05/2023, 17/05/2023 and 23/05/2023
Appellant has not taken any steps to provide copy of waiver petition and other Documents to the Respondent Bank to enabling filing counter.
Call before Hon’ble Chairperson on 16/06/2023.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dr. Leena Ranjini.V
- respondent
Sbi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 331090003682022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
18 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court