Leena Ranjini v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal allowed the appellant to withdraw an application for waiver. Consequently, the application was dismissed and the underlying appeal was rejected as it became academic.
What did the court decide?
Permission accorded to withdraw Application IA 2/2023; Application dismissed as withdrawn; Appeal AIR (SA) 368/2022 rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 2nd Day of August, 2023
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CHAIRPERSON
IA 2/2023 (Waiver)
In
AIR (SA) 368/2022
(SA 94/2021 on the file of DRT III, Chennai)
Between
Dr. Leena Ranjini V. D/o Mr. Vedachalam, No.353A/1, Brindavan Nagar, New Colony, T.K.M. Road, Chengalpattu 603 002.
….Appellant
And
The Authorised Officer, State Bank of India, Chengalpattu Branch, Varada Reddy Street, Vedhachalam Nagar, Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu 603 001.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dr. Leena Ranjini V
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, State Bank of India
Coram
S. Ravi Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
18 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court