D.Senthil v. Indian Overseas Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:365/202 3
D.Senthil V/S Indian Overseas Bank
30/05/2023
Representing counsel Lokesh Kumar for Appellant present.
Few Office Objections still pending despite considerable time given.
Hence Appeal is declined in terms of Rule 6 (4) of the DRAT (Procedure) Rules 1994 as office objections not complied in reasonable time
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
D.Senthil
- respondent
Indian Overseas Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court