Kiran Jose v. South Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai addressed an application for waiver of the statutory deposit required for entertaining an appeal. The Tribunal directed the appellants to deposit 25% of the amount demanded in the notice to proceed.
What did the court decide?
Deposit of Rs. 36,03,065, representing 25% of the demanded amount, ordered within two weeks to entertain the appeal.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 124/2023 In A.IR:2/2023
Kiran Jose & Ors V/S The South Indian Bank Ltd & Anr
12/06/2023
This Application is filed seeking waiver of statutory deposit under Section 18 (1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002, for entertaining the Appeal.
Advocate for Petitioners/Appellants submitted that Bank demanded Rs.1,48,00,258.52p, through Notice issued under Section 13(2) of SARFAESI Act, 2002, dated 11.11.2021. Subsequent to it, a sum of Rs.4 Lakhs is paid in the month of February, 2022, and thereafter, Bank issued Notice under Section 13(4) of SARFAESI Act, 2002, demanding Rs.1,44,12,258.52p. It is submitted, Appeal is preferred against an Interim Order, and main plea of Petitioners/Appellants is that it is an agriculture land, and SARFAESI Act, 2002, cannot be invoked.
Advocate for Bank submitted that demand is of the year 2021, and now, the liability is more than what is indicated in Notice issued under Section 13(4) of SARFAESI Act, 2002.
Considering submissions of both sides, without going into merits and demerits of the case, I am of the view that directing Petitioners/Appellants to deposit 25% of amount demanded in Possession Notice issued under Section 13(4) of SARFAESI Act, 2002, would meet requirement under Section 18 (1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002, for entertaining the Appeal.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a waiver of statutory deposit is required to entertain the appeal under Section 18(1) of the SARFAESI Act.
Whether Section 13(4) notice under the SARFAESI Act is appropriate in the case.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kiran Jose & Ors
- respondent
The South Indian Bank Ltd & Anr
Coram
Chairperson
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · June
- CNR
- 331090000022023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
15 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court