Kiran Jose v. South Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
This order records the listing of an application before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai. No representation was filed by the petitioners. The respondent bank was given time to file vakalath and counter.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 40/2023 in IA 41/2023
In
A.IR:2/2023
Kiran Jose & Ors V/S The South Indian Bank Ltd & Anr
30/01/2023
No representation for petitioners/appellants. Advocate Shri M.L. Ganesh undertakes to file vakalath for respondent bank and sought time for filing vakalath and counter.
At request of Ld. Counsel for respondent bank, posted to 13.2.2023 for vakalath and counter.
Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kiran Jose
- respondent
South Indian Bank Ltd
Coram
Chairperson
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · January
- CNR
- 331090000022023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
15 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court