Kesavarapu Shanmukeswara Rao v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Tribunal recalled prior default dismissal and admitted the appeal for listing after granting an adjournment due to the appellant's absence on the hearing date.
What did the court decide?
Order dated 13.04.2023 recalled; Appeal admitted and restored for hearing on 28th August, 2023.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Misc. Application Dy No. 314 of 2023
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
13.07.2023
Kesavarapu Shanukeswara Rao ... Appellants -VsUnion Bank of India & ors. ... Respondent
Ms. Alisha Kar, Learned Counsel for the Appellant None for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Admission
Respondents are served through paper publication but not represented.
Heard the Learned Counsel for the Appellant. Appeal was dismissed in default on 13.04.2023. It is submitted that on the date fixed Learned Counsel for the Appellant could not appear as he was out of station. Having considered the submission, I found the ground to be sufficient. Accordingly, order dated 13.04.2023 is recalled. Dy. No. 314 of 2023 is allowed. Appeal be restored to its original number.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kesavarapu Shanukeswara Rao
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 191090003142023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court