M/ S Kasturi Rice Mill v. Indian Bank and 4 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Thin interim order: The court directed the respondent-bank to file a reply to the appeal despite an earlier order, set a hearing date, but passed no substantive legal decision.
What the court decided
Appeal Dy. No. 873/2022 Date: 03.01.2023
M/s Kasturi Rice Mill Vs. Indian Bank
Present: Shri Ashutosh Goswami, Advocate holding brief of Shri R. G. Goswami, counsel for the appellant, Shri P. N. Tripathi, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Inspite of earlier order dated 10.11.2022, no reply has been filed by the respondent-Bank. Let the reply be filed by the respondent-bank by the next date, failing which appropriate order shall be passed.
List this case on 31.03.2023 for reply.
Anupam
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s Kasturi Rice Mill
- respondent
Indian Bank
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · January
- CNR
- 091090008732022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court