Kantaben Ravjibhai Patel v. Hdfc Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The DRAT Mumbai declined to register Misc. Appeal No. 1796/2023. The appellant was absent when the matter was called to dispose of defects. The court presumed lack of interest and refused registration under Rule 6(4).
What did the court decide?
Misc. Appeal No. 1796/2023 declined for registration.
What the court decided
1 ■1
I
(V ■
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai
Misc.Appeal (D) No. 1796/2023
KantabenRavjibhai Patel
.Appellant
V^s.
HDFC Bank Ltd &Anr
Respondents
Misc.Appeal (D) No. 1796/2023 is listed in today’s board (10.04.2024) before the Registrar at 02.30 PM for compliance/removal of defects. The said Board is displayed in Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on the Notice Board of DRAT Mumbai.
None present for the Appellant when matter is called.
Misc.Appeal (D) No.1796/2023 was filed on 04.10.23 and certain objections were raised by the registry for compliance/removal of defects. However, despite sufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defects till date.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to register the Misc. Appeal (D) having failed to remove registry objections despite sufficient opportunity.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kantaben Ravjibhai Patel
- respondent
HDFC Bank Ltd
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 271090017962023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Nishad Fazil F
- Order 2 — this page · Nishad Fazil F
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court