M/ s Jai Hanuman Agrotech Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. Canara Bank and 3 Ors.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 1224/2022 Date: 09.02.2023
M/s Jai Hanuman Agrotech Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Canara Bank & Ors.
Present: Shri Mahendra Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Shri V. K. Pandey, counsel for the appellants, Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
According to the report of the registry dated 08.02.2023, the affidavit of service has been filed along with tracking report and notice sent to the respondent no. 2 has returned back with endorsement “insufficient address”. Let the appellant take fresh steps within 10 days for service of notice upon the respondent no. 2 through publication in the newspapers having wide circulation in the area. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank files recall application being I.A. No. 105/2023 as well as reply to the appeal, after serving copy of the same upon the counsel for the appellant, who may file rejoinder by the next date.
List this case on 23.02.2023 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s Jai Hanuman Agrotech Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
- respondent
Canara Bank & Ors.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · February
- CNR
- 091090012242022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court