Citi Bank v. Ami Vishal Pandya
Case brief
What is this about?
The judgment is a non-substantive document consisting of the order list, appearance notes, and calendar entries. It does not contain a decision, reasoning, or relief.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
~
• •• . l«
DEBTS RECOVERY APPElIaTE TRIBUNAL,
I V
Mlac’Appllcntlon No. .0(20 1 I “ No. 7^- /Vo. /€
In'
Appeal ‘ No. of 20
Qif' Bonk, m-a ... Appollnnts
(Advocate. r J
Voraua i'
i'
u.Roopondnnta
•;» '
(Advocate [
)
Office Notes,LppenrnilcefiI '
Date
.■ and Registrar's order/Jchalrpsrjgoti'o Ordoro
A3/oa/^Z3
■j ’7i>J U/M
J* !
■„ j(eyp
/\Ze>
^ir cfaj&J#' &). ' . 1
^6-
VuxiL) M> . 08/ SfiS! M'"
•{ ;7
^iloel^tJs
: ! u6<J
tifyellCud &. ^5^;
j / -J) fy. fd^,
cle^h.
( Led^-J) /Ji ■ /Ze^.
OmI /-<rt- <
<9<©/J-8/!ia2Zl-'
/O) M''<br>P.T.O.
J
| Date | _Office. _Notos, Appearances and Registrar’s order _I _Chairperson's Orders |
|---|---|
| O^/og/^o^s | IQ. _103) _QO'SS. P'dv- Aaoja ■‘TeripciJrhi App-d IcAn-K rx/one Po-zr iPe^po^ d e^’- Adj . Po^ Penno-x/cd o'P d^Pe^Ys -Po |
| 2/OC] 1'20^3 | |
| O'! / M /'20'13 | ^=0-^ PemovoJ o f- / )'2_/'2.0'2^ 05 Adx-OOeeY PutoKi’Y Pott Appel Ian 4- r^s. A^M'zrQdha m oJ K PavYj t PeTS’^n ‘ CRadhacRT (No- ^5^8(059-355-2) °P 'f<'2-) Ad/ _’ _Apcv?rr\a dKclhav P^o?T "1 fs/or'e Pcj?r o V+xe'zr Aespond^n^' • PeTf AppeJlck/x^- Seek Virrxe <aX' • 'Reraovoj *” \asA- chance . |
| i4^ | <5' Sa Ad/ Neek **(f)fp« |
c
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Nishad Fazil F
- Order 2 · Ashok Menon
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court