Singha Kalu Nobo Kumar v. Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd.

B£BTS. RECOVERY APPELLAf
HTRLBUNAL, MOM BAB '
. .>Ml8c Application No. Of2o • ’ H' -
twi&vql,.- Xi; .
!?'"• ?$
(Voi3C> RvaV/vctL ... Appellants
■ (Advocate. ■ A? •
J
Versiio .
x 6^ ■'
TJ-jP - •...Rospondants
(Advocate_ ____
J
1 >
i . --------- ------- - —
* Onto Office Notos, Appearances 1
and Registrar’s order / Chalrper&on'o Orders
—------------_____ ■' ________ _ 'H___ ;i ._.
Appeal presented .. by J
Advocate for Appellant with D,D.^)$fe
of Rs. on
(33-0^-^ being aggrieved by the in pugned QP r / final order
passed on |n s 4 No.^gfbf^l^
by DRTrH^AuvvikxA .u/s 20-oPRr ko^^r p-HM-Tm 7 10 of
S.A.R.FAES.I. Act. 2002. I
Exh - 1 Appeal Memo
S.O. for compliance fo u>
REGISTRAR
None iPoqT bpH>
p.dj Ry?r CompUorce. |
p.dj Po?TCompliorce. ro . 2^ /|O/2O23<
T IT I g IS^zro zr ,
P.T.O.

Date	. Office Notes, Appearances and Registrar’s order / Chairperson's Orders
10/202.-3	■ One to administrative reason. board discharged: _■'2(3/1'21 _‘2-0'23 Since all Office Objections are removed the .-.ppeal be numbered and registered as MiaGeHafiteeus Appeal
QOII2./2O23	1 fefer? £ ■’ _" _<■ s V rxjor^e Fdtt bo+-b p\clj **RemoYojopdeP^-te -h> **rZb/o2/2c£<^.