Appeal before DRAT, Mumbai. IA for condonation of delay to bring legal representatives of deceased 2nd respondent on record. Application allowed with consequential amendment ordered.
Condonation of delay allowed; consequential amendment directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No. 535/2023(CoD)
In
Appeal on Diary No. 160/2021 Between
CITI Bank … Appellant/s
V/s.
AMI Vishal Pandya & Anr. …Respondent/s Ms. Aparna Jagtap, i/b Ms. Uma Fadia, Advocate for Respondent. -: Order dated: 18/04/2024:-
No representation for the Appellant.
I.A. No. 535/2023 is an application for condonation of delay
in filling the application for bringing the legal representatives of the deceased 2nd Respondent on record.
The 1st Respondent has appeared and has no objection.
Hence, the application for condonation of delay is allowed. Carry out the consequential amendment. Copy of the amended appeal memorandum shall be served on the Respondents.
List on 03.05.2024 before Registrar.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-23
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay for bringing legal representatives of deceased respondent on record should be allowed.
CITI Bank
AMI Vishal Pandya & Anr.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
