The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal allowed an application for impleading the auction purchaser as an additional respondent and directed consequential amendments to the appeal memorandum.
Application allowed; consequential amendment to Appeal Memorandum permitted and served on Respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 323/2023 (LRs)
In Misc. Appeal No. 127/2022
Between
Jaysingh S/o Ashrifilalji Yadav … Appellant/s V/s.
The Authorized Officer, Shikshak Sahakari Bank …Respondent/s Ltd. & Ors.
Mr. R.K. Thakhar, Advocate for Appellant.
-: Order dated: 21/07/2023:-
I.A. 323/2023 is an application for impleading the auction purchaser as an additional Respondent.
The Application is allowed and consequential amendment shall be carried out to Appeal Memorandum. Copy of the amendment Appeal Memorandum shall be served on the Respondents.
Post on 07.08.2023 before the Registrar for carrying out the amendment.
psa-10
Sd/Chairperson
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the auction purchaser should be impleaded as an additional respondent.
Jaysingh S/o Ashrifilalji Yadav
The Authorized Officer, Shikshak Sahakari Bank Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
