Jayalakshmi Neelakantan v. Icici Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
In Appeal on Diary No. 1041/2023, the Tribunal noticed the respondent's counsel sought time to file a reply. The order granted four weeks to file the reply and fixed the post for hearing.
What did the court decide?
Time granted to file reply within four weeks; next post fixed on 27.10.2023.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal on Diary No. 1041/2023
Between
Jayalakshmi Neelakantan & Anr. V/s.
ICICI Bank Ltd &Ors.
… Appellant/s
…Respondent/s
An Advocate for Appellants is present.
Mr. Harjot Singh, i/b M/s. Raval Shah & Co., Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
Mr. Mathew Nedumbara, along with M. Nedumbara, i/b Nedumbara and Nedumbara, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4
-: Order dated: 20/07/2023:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the 1st Respondent seeks time
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents are granted time to file a reply to the appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jayalakshmi Neelakantan & Anr.
- respondent
ICICI Bank Ltd &Ors.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 271090010412023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Ashok Menon
- Order 2 — this page · Ashok Menon
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court