The Nasik Merchants Cooperative Bank Limited v. Ms Nidhi Playlam
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
' *
Contd Sheet
$ Office Notes, Appearances «
Date
and Registrar's order / Chairperson's Orders
• •;; A?
I,.
.r
- ■‘i-
’J ,/
'i4j ciJ X- X X
.*■
>■
i
V.
-f
k.:
FARAD
DEBTS recovery appellate TRIBUNAL. MUMBAI
Ml«c ApplicationIn ’ No. .of 20 I. No.^_________ Appeal No. of 20 'Zc(g/<2.'X Dr>i ugg /<? i r^dshi k r^e^chanA^s Co©pc?roJ^ve Boniv AppeIIante **L ‘i ***
(Advocate j^gbci) P^oV-kcryS J Versus P^s.fXM'dH PlQyam
...Respondents
(Advocate.
)
| Date 2o^ |
/ P^ S eTTN^ce is f>pp Pott se?n^ce bg se^'ce . £xdj. f~c>ir ^’'V-ep-S +r* IS / H /'2o^2'3 , Office Notes, Appearances ____and Registrar’s order / Chalrperaon’s Orders pelv PaKuJ* Pdtt. VNom^ Pmr xQespooJenA- - PppehcivAV ack/occJ-^ ^■e?yjV<c^ afp davi)-. ^eysl^ce d d/ i V p<?C (rxcompiej-e <J.pom 40 wJ<e o£ rxoVi’ce uporx'TT’e-Spo'nd ents- |
|---|---|
| isfzrtnr. TT7G a* Mv,.AnJoj; Pcud- Po?r Appellant fNorve iPotj- Pesporxalen-K . . , P\ppeJlan+ V Zls^^e **SWMice of noWa ****_^ory _r«pondertt by 5«i** |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court