Ravikumar Anjaiah Mangipali v. Gic Housing Finance Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The provided text is non-substantive OCR noise and image fragments containing unparseable headers and fragmentary case citation details. No judicial reasoning, facts, or decision content is extractable.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| ■( | < *i • ****_■, _V . \ X* >■' *■;'i' ■<": ?r' / ‘** < J.‘ . |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| •J ‘V'- | V.'« _b _: ■. !- ' . ' ■ SJepJO'S,ilO8J0<ijieii6 _I _iop^' s/jBJioi'cio'a.'puB |
41 21 eirib ■- |
M si» |
•'X
-QEBT§_RjECoyg^Y APPELLATF
TRIBUNAL, MUMBAII
Miso Application No. . of 20 •
In ^kNoT.
.“Appeaf No. I MSVo
of 20%^
.. .P/4/
ppollants
(Advocnto,
J
Versus
r v ...Rospondonto
(Advocate
J
Onto •>nnit«•■!•**«««*«
Office Notes, Appenrances
and Registrar's order I Chfllrpersoii'o Orders
c>3W^J . _ .........
Appeal preBeiitec! by S<^AV\V ^•V>^M>Ay<OvVSr •
oviI^aO.
Advocate for A|7pellant with Qt&t-AW of Re. ^5o on
being aggrlevod by the liupj.igriod order / final orclor
passed on -2=ayil2^^ In S.A. /J^A. of
by DRT. IZr
ae-oHW.D.B.g, I- I Act 1993 / 10 of
S.A.R.F.A.E'.'S.I. Act. 2002. /
Exh - I Appeal Memo
S.O. for compllance.-lo
i
i
■i
REGIS^AR
iS/ ll /<2Zr2.J n/one forbo^ '
fKclj. Rvzr Compliance -bo 1
P.T.O.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 271090014902023
- Bench
- Nishad Fazil F
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Nishad Fazil F
- Order 2 · Nishad Fazil F
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court