Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited & Anr. v. The O/L of Navinon Ltd. (In Liqn.) and Ors. Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
r
1
Contd Sheet
| > i i |
- Date | ' • . •' ■ ____________________ J________________________________ _____________________________________________________ •■_______ Office Notes, Appearances and Registrar’s order/Chairperson’s Orders L AcAsa- ShotoVsQ CV->cx>>ar» fVzr AppeXlcccvV-. Pid>/. Sonah' Tain Po-TT ’Pesp- 3C^£: Acta . OhanShwe. Pov PeHpor*ien^ fMo-6 Adv ■ t^oTT pesPoncknV s^eX 4-^e ■fv 1 f Per J pdj Pott P'p'3 +o 's' ^/•aoos. |
|---|
)
FARAD
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI
Mlsc ApplicationIn No.’ .of 20 I. No._
Appeal No. /? Of20\O
L+J .kfor\Tr.
nd'3r'a
... Appellants
(Advocate Dg^h on nJ!
J
FMo^Tnon L+d op Al'3h Cou^
-VHa O/L-
\ r (Na/i non ■ L'HJ . ...Respondents
Sombay
(Advocate Ou' n.
)
Date Office Notes, Appearances
and Registrar's order I Chairperson's Orders
O^IOS/^o^ fAcK, ; Shobha Chavan 'AdtT Ppp<^anv- . --------------
. Son oJ a * cU n Fb-rS Pespo . (n
- s^or- R-ae-yrt-W-cWCJ^
Fick- Pcdtek dwH po'5' ,S,'
pvd-xiocud-e-
a'P'Gi ciaNoJ/"
<275^/1 ce 's comP ^e
dcwo-i jJ.|U-:| t HCn'l fB-Ok C'P
" (jp 0
bs hanJ a '^3
u(q)
fieeW 0
fW
o^/oaZzo?;
to adn,in(s(ratjve
discharged. 30 / / 0°/ 2 O'zS
4
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court