Canara Bank v. Pradeep Kumar Jaiswal and Anr.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 712/2022 Date: 18.07.2023
Canara Bank Vs. Pradeep Kumar Jaiswal & Anr.
Present: Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the appellant, Shri Manas Tandon, Advocate holding brief of Shri Bablu, counsel for the respondent no. 1, Shri Abhishek Shukla, counsel for the respondent no. 2- Auction Purchaser,
The office report dated 17.07.2023 shows that no reply has been filed on behalf of the respondents to the delay condonation application inspite of time being granted. Let the same be filed by the next date, failing which appropriate order shall be passed.
Learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 does not want to file reply and submits that the Bank may refund the money.
List this case on 07.11.2023 for reply.
Anupam
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Canara Bank
- respondent
Pradeep Kumar Jaiswal
- respondent
Auction Purchaser
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 091090007122022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court