Brij Mohan Chopra v. State Bank of India and Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 495/2022 Date: 25.04.2023
Present: Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the appellant, Shri Utkarsh Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri P. K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the respondent no. 2 is the proforma party as there is no relief claimed against him, therefore, the service of notice with regard to the said respondent may be dispensed with. Ordered accordingly.
The reply of the respondent no. 1 is on record, but no reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 3. Let the respondent no. 3 file reply by the next date.
List this case on 03.07.2023 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Appellant
- respondent
Respondent-Bank
- respondent
Respondent no. 2
- respondent
Respondent no. 3
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 091090004952022
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court