Battula Renuka v. Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed in default dated 01.03.2023 when appellant was unrepresented in court while respondent counsel appeared.
What did the court decide?
Appeal Diary No. 490 of 2020 dismissed in default.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 490 of 2020
(Arising out of S.A. 799 of 2017 in DRT-II, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
01.03.2023 Battula Renuka … Appellant -VsIndian Bank & 4 Others … Respondents
Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti with Ms. Sharmistha Pal, Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up in the revised list.
None appears to represent the Appellants. Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank are present.
Accordingly, the appeal, being Diary No. 490 of 2020, stands dismissed in default.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Battula Renuka
- respondent
Indian Bank
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · March
- CNR
- 191090004902020
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court