This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 310/2022 Date: 08.05.2023
Present: Shri Prabhav Srivastava, counsel for the appellant, The office report dated 03.05.2023 shows that the notice sent to the respondent no. 1 has returned back with endorsement “Factory closed” and the notice sent to the respondent no. 9 has returned back with endorsement “left”. There is nothing on record to show that the notice upon the respondent nos. 2 to 8 have been served or not as no affidavit of service has been filed.
Let the appellant take fresh steps within 10 days for service of notice upon the unserved respondents by publication in the newspaper having wide circulation in the area. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
List this case on 04.08.2023 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant needs to take fresh steps for service upon unserved respondents.
The State
Respondent No. 1
Respondent No. 9
Respondent Nos. 2 to 8
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court