Asian Petro Chemical and Anr. v. Bank of Baroda and 10 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal allowed an impleadment application filed by the appellant to add subsequent purchasers as respondents. A status quo order regarding the impugned property was maintained till the next hearing date of 01.11.2023.
What did the court decide?
Application to implead subsequent purchasers as respondents allowed; status quo on the property maintained.
What the court decided
Appeal Dy. No. 737/2023 Date: 17.07.2023
Asian Petro Chemical Vs. Bank of Baroda
Present: Shri S. K. Gupta, counsel for the appellant,
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
It is contended on behalf of the appellant that against the demand of Rs. 41.00 lacs and odd, Rs. 10.00 lacs has already been deposited before the Tribunal below and today Rs. 1.00 lac through demand draft no. 444744 dated 10.07.2023 is being deposited towards pre-deposit. As such total amount of Rs. 11.00 lacs has been deposited, which is more than 25% of the amount due. Therefore, the waiver application may be considered.
Let the said amount be kept in the form of FDR in the nationalized Bank for a period of one year in auto renewal scheme.
Learned counsel for the appellant has drawn attention of this Tribunal to the earlier order dated 21.06.2023, whereby it was observed that the subsequent purchasers-respondent nos. 3 to 6 were trying to create further interest of other persons by selling of the property, but there was nothing on record to show that any steps were taken by any of the said respondents. However, it was made open to the appellant that in case any such steps are taken by the subsequent purchasers, the appellant may move an application before this Tribunal for obtaining appropriate order. Hence, today an impleadment application has been moved on the ground that the subsequent purchasers have sold the property in question to other persons through sale deed dated 06.07.2023, copy of which is annexed as annexure no. 2 to the impleadment
application and a prayer has been made to implead the subsequent purchasers as respondents in the present appeal and status quo order pertaining to the property in question may be passed to avoid future complication in the matter.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the application to implead subsequent purchasers as respondents in the present appeal should be allowed.
Whether the existing status quo order on the property in question should be maintained pending the outcome of the appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Asian Petro Chemical
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
- intervenor
Subsequent Purchasers
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 091090007372023
- Topic
- Property and Title
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court