Arun Dhondiba Mali v. Osmanabad Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The provided text is an unprocessable scanned header containing OCR noise with no substantive judgment content, parties, or legal reasoning.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
r M
i 1 J
Contd Sheet
j
l| Office Notes. Appearances .• .:/.
. Date
and Registrar's order/Chairperson’s Orders
i.
iG/fO/^O^ . . [None IRrsr (Appellexn4~-•
... FAdJ fVoJ-iK Pe^pond^- . ■«
Adv.I’fetr Rf^spoiad^P'^^/^<xkq)a+-J
nCirrY
(MJ Pott Removed oP olejects
; QQ/ ^/2.ok3 .
tA I 12 I'2.0'23 Vx/on e ^P Pdla vvV-
t-rAOW,. dv, ■ V^opj- 1 t: Fb P Ond n K • I
Aoly ■ Pb tt Pemo v<jj o £ cj-e^c @/GI /Zc-z-H
*31/ C Ry i6+w ?r.
:r^
i
h
'■ .1
• i
I
1
L
*Sr— • ^■r •
r
FARAD
MUMBAI
Mlsc Application No. _ of 2o
I. No.
Appeal y No. I\ <U ntn2^
Al
... Appellants
(Advocate Swj
I
Versus
Respondents
(kXocate^
J
Date Office Notes, Appearances
and Registrars order / Chairperson's Orders
Appeal presented by g>ti ir-e.
Advocate for Appellant wilhO.D. / IPO of Rs. — on
being aggrieved by the impugned order / final order
passed on in S.A. / Qd<No^4—of.^>
by DRT’ ---------- u/s 20 of R.D.D.D.& P I Act 1993 / 18 of
S.A.R.F.A.E'S.I. Act. 2002.
Exh - I Appeal Memo
. S.O;-for compliance to .5
RE iTRAi
23/og/2o23 None fb®' bopa^M-e-S'
pdj ft<CompKance to 13//C /2o<23
\ P.T.O.
L
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Appellants
- respondent
Respondents
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 271090011962023
- Bench
- Nishad Fazil F
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court