Alluri Vijaya Kumar v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Registrar noted the filing of a miscellaneous appeal under Section 20 of the RDBFI Act, acknowledging fee payment and jurisdiction, but observed a defect in the non-filing of a waiver application. The matter was posted for removal of defects by the appellant.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Misc. Appeal Dy. No. 150 of 2023 Date: 27/02/2023
Alluri Vijaya Kumar ------------Appellant
Versus
Syndicate Bank & Ors.. ------------Respondents
Received an application on 24/02/2023 filed online under Section 20 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 presented by Ld. Advocate, Mr. Jibantaraj Dan Roy. Hard copy of the application received on 27/02/2023.
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of Alluri Vijaya Kumar against the order dated 16/02/2023 passed in O.A. No. 879 of 2016 in DRT-Visakhapatnam. Application fees of Rs.255/vide Transaction Ref. ID 2402230018295 dt. 24.02.2023 has been paid through online along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Alluri Vijaya Kumar
- respondent
Syndicate Bank & Ors.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court