Vinod Kumar and Anothers v. Union Bank of India and 2 Ors.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 133/2019 Date: 29.03.2022
Vinod Kumar and Anr. Vs. Union Bank of India
Present: Shri S. K. Gupta, counsel for the appellants, Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the respondent nos. 1 & 2-Bank, Shri Ajay Srivastava, counsel for the respondent no. 3,
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that the reply has already been filed, but the learned counsel for the appellants states that he has not been served with the copy of the said reply. Shri Arora states that another copy of reply shall be served upon the counsel for the appellant, who may file rejoinder by the next date.
List this case on 21.07.2022 for rejoinder.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vinod Kumar and Anr.
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court