ILT decided that a transfer petition became infructuous due to redefined DRt jurisdiction, leading to dismissal without further analysis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Transfer Petition No. 05/2022
Between
J M Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd … Appellant/s & Anr.
V/s.
Veer Gurjar Aluminum Industries Pvt. Ltd. …Respondent/s
Mr T.N. Tripathi, i/b M/s. T.N. Tripathi & Co., Advocate for Appellant.
Mr Rajesh Nagori, Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 12/10/2022:-
In view of the notification regarding the re-defined jurisdiction of D.R.T. this application for transfer has become infructuous and hence, the learned counsel appearing for the Appellant does not insist on proceeding with the application.
The application is dismissed as infructuous.
All Miscellaneous Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
Chairperson
psa-30
1
J M Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd
Veer Gurjar Aluminum Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
