Sri Dipankar Majumder and Others v. State Bank of India
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 01 of 2020
(Arising out of S.A. 40 of 2017 in DRT, Guwahati)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
| 15.09.2022 | Dipankar Majumdar & 2 Others … Appellants -Vs- State Bank of India … Respondent |
|---|---|
| Mr. Debabrata Basu Ray, Learned Counsel for Appellants |
|
| Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhuri with Ms. Saswata Sikder, Learned |
|
| Counsel for Respondent |
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhuri, Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank undertakes to file Vakalatnama within a week.
Learned Counsel submits, on instruction, that Bank has withdrawn the Notices issued under Sections 13(2) dated 24th August, 2016 and 13 (4) dated 30th March, 2017 and seeks time to bring all these facts on record.
List on 27th September, 2022.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dipankar Majumdar & 2 Others
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 191090000012020
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court