Sri Bikash Prasad v. Punjab National Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal by Bikash Prasad against a DRT order under TSA 696 of 2018. The appellant filed an affidavit seeking withdrawal. The tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn and disposed of pending applications.
What did the court decide?
Appeal withdrawn and dismissed; pending applications disposed; interim orders vacated.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Dairy No. 127 of 2019)
(Arising out ofTSA.696 of 2018 in S.A/40/2018 DRT-Guwahati)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
11.07.2022 Sri Bikash Prasad … Appellant -VsPunjab National Bank … Respondent Mr. R.S. Tiwari, Learned Counsel for Appellant Mr. Omkar Ganguly, Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Affidavit filed by the Learned Counsel for the Respondents No.1 & 2 is taken on record. Learned Counsel submits that balance amount has been received.
Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that he wants to withdraw the Appeal.
In v0iew of the above submission, the Dairy No. 127 of 2019 is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending IA if any, Stands disposed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. File be consigned to record room.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 11th July, 2022 02/rc
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bikash Prasad
- respondent
Punjab National Bank
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court