Smt Sohini Sen v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Order noting procedural defects in a SRA Appeal application and directing the appellant to rectify deficiencies within 15 days.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA Diary no.390/2021; Dt:21/04/2022
Smt. Sohini Sen.………...Appellant
Vs.
The Authorised Officer, Canara Bank & ors..……….Respondents
Received an application under section 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 presented by Ld. Advocate, Ms. Zeba Parveen.
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of Smt. Sohini Sen against the order dt. 23.06.2021 in SA-327/2020 passed by the Ld. Presiding Officer, DRT-3, Kolkata. Application fees of Rs.7,875/- vide T.R. no.115122 dt. 07.07.2021 has been paid along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate, Ms. Zeba Parveen.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
The Application is filed well within the period of Limitation.
An application for waiver of pre-deposit is filed along with this application.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Sohini Sen
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, Canara Bank & ors.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court