Smt Shubha Goel v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal listed the matter for compliance on the predeposit order dated 04.03.2020. No amount was deposited. Appellant sought adjournment pending compromise talks; said prayed denied.
What did the court decide?
Case listed on 07.11.2022; adjournment for compromise talks granted pending compliance.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.A. No. 63/2019 In Appeal Dy. No. 43/2019 Date: 04.08.2022
Smt. Shubha Goel & Ors. Vs. Bank of Baroda
Present: Shri Amit Khanna, counsel for the appellants, Shri Sandeep Kumar Singh, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank has drawn attention of this Tribunal that inspite of earlier order dated 04.03.2020, no amount has been deposited by the appellants towards predeposit.
Learned counsel for the appellants contends that talks of compromise are going-on and the matter is likely to be settled, therefore, he prays for adjournment.
List this case on 07.11.2022 for compliance.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Shubha Goel & Ors.
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · August
- CNR
- 091090000432019
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court