Smt Shubha Goel v. Bank of Baroda
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.A. No. 63/2019 In Appeal Dy. No. 43/2019 Date: 07.11.2022
Smt. Shubha Goel & Ors. Vs. Bank of Baroda
Present: Shri A. K. Bansal, counsel for the appellants, Shri Sandeep Kumar Singh, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank seeks time to file reply.
Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the appellant is neither borrower nor guarantor and no notice has been served upon him and on the pretext that one Shri Vipin Kumar Goel, who has been shown to be a guarantor, the appellants have been incorrectly made party. Let the respondent-Bank file response to the waiver application by the next date.
List this case on 13.01.2023 for compliance.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Shubha Goel & Ors.
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 091090000432019
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court