Sheo Karan Pandey v. Gramin Bank of Aryavart and Anr.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 293/2022 Date: 21.09.2022
Sheo Karan Pandey Vs. Gramin Bank of Aryavart
Present: Shri Abhishek Awasthi, Advocate holding brief of Shri R. S. Pandey, counsel for the appellant,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter may be adjourned for today, as the arguing counsel Shri R. S. Pandey is indisposed.
It appears that the appellant has not deposited even 25% of the amount due, which is mandatory in nature. Hence, the appellant is directed to deposit 25% of the amount due on or before the next date, so that the waiver application can be considered.
List this case on 15.11.2022 for pre-deposit.
VN Giri
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sheo Karan Pandey
- respondent
Gramin Bank of Aryavart
Coram
VN Giri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 091090002932022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court