Samar Ghosh v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed an appeal in default on the date of hearing due to the non-appearance of the appellants. All pending applications and interim orders were disposed of accordingly.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 64 of 2019)
(Arising out of S.A. 287 of 2015 in DRT-3, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
22.04.2022 Samar Ghosh & Another … Appellants -vsState Bank of India & 2 Others … Respondent
None for Appellant
Mr. Debasish Karmakar with Mr. Arya Nandi, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 4
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up on the revised call. None is present for Appellants though Mr. Debasish Karmakar, Learned Counsel appears for Respondent No. 4.
The appeal, being Diary No. 64 of 2019, is dismissed in default.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stands dismissed, being infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Samar Ghosh & Another
- respondent
State Bank of India
- respondent
2 Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 191090000642019
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court