Biswajit Dey v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata dismissed an appeal in default; no parties were present. Pending incidental applications were dismissed as infructuous, and interim orders were vacated.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed in default; pending incidental applications dismissed as infructuous; interim orders vacated.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 142 of 2020)
(Arising out of O.A. 835 of 2011 in DRT, Siliguri)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
22.04.2022 Biswajit Dey … Appellant -vsState Bank of India … Respondent None for Appellant
None for Respondent Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up on the revised call. None is present for either of the parties.
The appeal, being Diary No. 142 of 2010, is dismissed in default.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stands dismissed, being infructuous.
Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
Record be consigned to record room.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Biswajit Dey
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 191090001422020
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court