Samar Ghosh v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Single bench order recording counsel's sickness prayer and fixing the matter for next day without deciding the pending application.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 64 of 2019
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
17.10.2023 Samar Ghosh & Another
… Appellants
-vs-
State Bank of India & 2 Others
… Respondents
Mr. Prosenjit Mukherjee with Mr. Saptarshi Chakraborty and Ms. Tiyasa Ghosh, Learned Counsel for Appellants
Ms. Indrani Dey, Counsel for Respondent No. 4
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
It is submitted that her Counsel for Respondent Bank is not well and prays for adjournment.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Samar Ghosh & Another
- respondent
State Bank of India & 2 Others
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · October
- CNR
- 191090000642019
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court