The Appeals Tribunal directed the appellant to substitute the legal heirs of Respondent No. 8 within two weeks, failing which the appeal would be dismissed for default.
Appellant to substitute legal heirs of Respondent No. 8 within two weeks else appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 95 of 2018) (Arising out of M.A 46 of 2017 – Kolkata-3)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
15.03.2022 Ramesh Kumar Jaiswal … Appellant Vs.
Balaram Das & Others
…Respondents
None for Appellants
Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhuri with Ms. Saswati Sikdar, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 3 and 4/ Allahabad Bank
None for other Respondents
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
It appears that this Tribunal had passed an order on 31st July, 2018 directing the Appellants to take steps for substitution of the legal heirs of Respondent No. 8. It appears that neither any steps have so far been taken nor any notices have been issued.
Appellant is directed to take steps for substituting the legal heirs of Respondent No. 8 within a period of two weeks; failing which, the appeal shall be dismissed on the ground of default for not taking appropriate step towards substitution.
List the matter on 11th April, 2022.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 15th March, 2022 03/ac
Ramesh Kumar Jaiswal
Balaram Das & Others
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
