Ms B U Industries Ltd. and Another v. Central Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal listed the appeal on the point of limitation after noting no application for condonation of delay was filed. An affidavit in opposition was requested.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 295 of 2022)
(Arising out of IA/47/20 in S.A. 121 of 2018 in DRT- Siliguri)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
12.07.2022 B.U. Industries & Another. … Appellant
-VsCentral Bank of India & Others. … Respondents
Mr.,Arjun Samanta Learned Counsel for Appellant.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
For Admission
This is an appeal preferred by the appellant challenging the impugned order dated 2/6/2020 passed by the Learned DRT, Siliguri. It appears that, after filing the appeal appellant invoked the jurisdiction of Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta under Article No. 227 which was decided on 9/6/2022. Petition was disposed of and liberty was granted to the Appellant to avail the remedies before the Appellate Tribunal in accordance with the law.
Thereafter appellant has moved this appeal. Apparently the appeal is time barred but no application for condo nation of delay or under section 5 of the Limitation Act is moved. On quarry being raised, learned counsel for the appellant submits that appeal is within time and the matter needs consideration.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal is within the limitation period.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
B.U. Industries & Another
- respondent
Central Bank of India & Others
Coram
ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court