Inderjeet Kaur v. Bank of Baroda and Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 65/2018 Date: 29.03.2022
Inderjeet Kaur Vs. Bank of Baroda and Ors.
Present: Shri Bharat Kant, Advocate holding brief of Shri Kushal Kant, counsel for the appellant, Shri Satyajeet Mukherji, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Shri Pradeep Kumar Pandey, counsel for the respondents,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the arguing counsel Shri Kushal Kant could not come on account of some personal difficulty, therefore, he seeks time to argue the case.
Learned counsels for the respondents oppose to the said prayer.
Since the adjournment has been prayed on personal ground of the counsel for the appellant, let the matter be listed for hearing on 19.07.2022.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Inderjeet Kaur
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court