The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (Delhi) listed an appeal for further directions. The Registrar observed that the impugned order did not indicate the disposal of the underlying Debt Recovery Tribunal case, and court fees had not been ascertained or deposited. The matter was adjourned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No.57/2022 Arising out of T.S.A.No.10/2021 (DRT, Jaipur)
Edelweiss Assets Reconstruction Company Ltd. Vs
M/s Tulip Data Services Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
02.06.2022
Present: Ms. Manisha Agarwal, counsel for Appellant
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
The impugned order dated 07.05.2022 nowhere indicates that the T.S.A. No.10/2021 has been disposed off. The case status of the same on DRT website also indicates that the case is still pending. As such court fees has not been ascertained/ deposited.
The matter is listed before the Hon’ble Chairperson for further directions on 12.07.2022.
(Rajmani Sinha) Registrar
-sandesh
Edelweiss Assets Reconstruction Company Ltd.
M/s Tulip Data Services Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
