The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal in default as no representative appeared to represent the Appellants during the hearing held on 15.07.2022.
Appeal dismissed in default; pending I.A.s closed; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 80 of 2019)
(Arising out of T.S.A. 689 of 2018 in DRT, Siliguri)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
15.07.2022 M/s. B.U. Industries & Another … Appellants -VsCentral Bank of India & Another … Respondents
None for Appellants
Mr. Gautam Chakraborty, Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up in the second round.
None appears to represent the Appellants.
Accordingly, the appeal, being Diary No. 80 of 2019, stands dismissed in default.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stand closed.
Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 15th July, 2022 03/ac
M/s. B.U. Industries & Another
Central Bank of India & Another
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
