Canara Bank v. Sanjog Arora and 7 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The court listed the regular appeal for hearing on 13.12.2022. The court acknowledged an impleadment application filed by Mrs. Meena Mishra and directed that rejoinder be filed if required.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 39/2022 Date: 15.09.2022
Canara Bank Vs. Sanjog Arora and Ors.
Present: Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the appellant, Shri Vipul Pandey, counsel for the respondent no. 1, Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the respondent,
Mrs. Meena Mishra, Advocate appears and submits that she has filed an impleadment application on the ground that her property has been sold. Copy of the same has been given to the counsel for the appellant today.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter may be posted for hearing and in the meantime, rejoinder and reply to the impleadment application may be filed, if required.
As prayed, list this case on 13.12.2022 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Canara Bank
- respondent
Sanjog Arora
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court