This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I.A. No. 14/2022 In Appeal Dy. No. 21/2020 Date: 28.03.2022
Dena Bank/Bank of Baroda Vs. M/s Janta Ply-N Glass Sons and Ors.
Present: Shri Satyajit Mukherji, counsel for the appellant-Bank, Shri Alok Rai, counsel for the respondents no. 1, 2 & 3, Shri R. P. Srivastava, counsel for the respondent no. 4, None for the respondent no. 6,
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks time to file application for amending the prayer clause, which may be filed by the next date.
Learned counsel for the respondents no. 1, 2 & 3 files I.A. No. 32/2022 stating that the amount deposited by the respondent no. 4-HDFC Bank with the Registrar of this Tribunal be released in favour of the applicant-respondent no. 1.
Learned counsel for the appellant undertakes to serve a copy of the memo to the counsel for the respondent no. 4 within 48 hours.
Since no notice has yet been issued to the respondent no. 5, therefore, the appellant is directed to serve the notice upon the respondent no. 5 by two modes i.e. registered post with A.D. and speed post. Steps to be taken by the appellant within 15 days. Affidavit of service along with tracking report be filed by the next date.
List this case on 15.07.2022 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Dena Bank
M/s Janta Ply-N Glass Sons and Ors.
HDFC Bank
R. D. Khare
N. V. Giri
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court