Single paragraph order allowing a recall application for an appeal filed in 2015, with no counsel present for other respondents and a future listing date fixed for the reply.
Recall application allowed; served respondents directed to file reply by next date; case listed for 15.02.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.A. No. 26/2021 In Regular Appeal No. 329/2015 Date: 01.12.2022
Bhartia Industries Ltd. Vs. Kotak Mahindra Bank & Ors.
Present: Shri Azim Ahmad Kazmi, counsel for the appellant, Shri N. K. Dwivedi, Advocate holding brief of Shri Rakesh Mishra, counsel for the respondent no. 1, Shri Ankur Agarwal, counsel for the respondent no. 9, None for the other respondents,
Learned counsel for the appellant files proof of publication.
The cause shown in the recall application is sufficient, to which the learned counsels for the respondents have no objection. Accordingly, the recall application is allowed.
Let the served respondents file reply by the next date, failing which no further time will be given, as the appeal is of the year 2015.
List this case on 15.02.2023 for reply.
VN Giri
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the recall application should be allowed given the age of the appeal.
Bhartia Industries Ltd.
Kotak Mahindra Bank
VN Giri
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
